Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Actually,reporting on NK or China's surveillance is usually because they are geopolitical adversaries not because they are dystopian. So to think that the EU cares about freedom or privacy is to be naïve





The point is that reporting on NK's and China's surveillance of their own citizens is framed as dystopian. The framing only works if they claim that such surveillance is dystopian.

Of course elected representatives don't necessarily have the same opinions as news reporters. But you would expect consistency within the same publication


“This is absolutely horrific and they should be ashamed… so anyway, just out of curiosity, do you think we could do something like this?”

Hypocrisy at it’s finest.


there's a chance that an EU citizen could fight back against these legislation.

And it is encouraged to do so. Privacy is agency.


> there's a chance that an EU citizen could fight back against these legislation.

Just like in the scene in "Dumb and dumber" : " i would say ... like one in a million"


The system is designed to make you think you have a chance. Ask the 30 people arrested in the UK everyday for their social media posts what they think of this ability to "fight back".

It's not necessary to go outside of EU.

"In a despicable attack on the freedom of speech, a German right-wing journalist has been sentenced to seven months’ probation for mocking left-wing Interior Minister Nancy Faeser."

"The editor-in-chief of the news website Deutschland-Kurier was punished for sharing a satirical meme on his X account. The meme, which was posted by Bendels last February, shows Nancy Faeser holding up a sign, with the words: “I hate freedom of expression.”"

https://europeanconservative.com/articles/news/proving-the-p...


It's always funny (in a sad way) when a ruling should be admissible as clear evidence for the opposite ruling.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: