Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
38
36 days ago
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
(On | No) Syntactic Support for Error Handling
"u8" would have done the job fine and actually been readable
Macha
35 days ago
[–]
It would need to be &u8, as without a reference, you won't have any captured lifetimes, and therefore it wouldn't serve as an example for the capturing lifetime feature. &u8 is also a mostly pointless type in reality.
Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
