I don't know that I would call it an "illusion of thinking", but LLMs do have limitations. Humans do too. No amount of human thinking has solved numerous open problems.
The errors that LLMs make and the errors that people make are not probably not comparable enough in a lot of the discussions about LLM limitations at this point?
We have different failure modes. And I'm sure researchers, faced with these results, will be motivated to overcome these limitations. This is all good, keep it coming. I just don't understand the some of the naysaying here.
They naysayers just says that even when people are motivated to solve a problem the problem might still not get solved. And there are unsolved problems still with LLM, the AI hypemen say AGI is all but a given in a few years time, but if that relies on some undiscovered breakthrough that is very unlikely since such breakthroughs are very rare.
