Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The difference between imitation and reasoning can be made more clear if we switch from language to numbers:

  1 3 7 15 31 63 ...
How do you continue this sequence? What's the 1000000th number in this sequence? Imitation continues the likeness of what it sees and quickly gets off track. Imitation can't go abstract and tell the 1000000th element without writing down a million numbers leading to the answer. Reasoning finds the rule behind the set of examples and uses this rule to predict the next numbers, so it never gets off track.

The rule generating the sequence can be a sophisticated recurrent formula, e.g. a(k) = 2a(k-1) - sqrt(a(k-3)). Imitation can't solve this problem beyond trivial examples, but an AI can do what a scientist would do: come up with hypotheses, verify them against the examples and eventually find a formula that's reasonably accurate. The role of an LLM here is to suggest possible formulas.

The same sequence of examples can be generated by many formulas that differ in complexity and accuracy. This provokes the idea of a simple competition between AIs: the one that creates the simplest formula that's 99.5% accurate - wins. The formula really means a small program, once we get beyond trivial recurrent rules.

The ability to find simple and accurate models of reality is the essense of intelligence.



Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: