Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Everything you say is true.

That said I think SpaceX is the only service even in the running for said contracts. Nasa doesnt have the capability, and Boeing is quite a way behind. There was already speculation that SpaceX would have to take on Boeings commitments for Artemis.



It's murky. NASA outsources a lot of money to SpaceX because Musk could burn through risk and money at levels NASA would get cancelled for.

At what point is SpaceX's benefiting from tax money and NASA technology become a reason to fold into a national asset.

China didn't achieve its Great Leap Forward by pandering to wealthy celebrities who cosplay as geniuses.


>Great Leap Forward

Altough most readers will catch your meaning, that phrase does not mean what you think it means.


>At what point is SpaceX's benefiting from tax money and NASA technology become a reason to fold into a national asset.

Was speculating that this might be the outcome. If you wanted to punish musk this would be the way to do it.

You would need to pay off Boeing at the same time but it could work.


The Great Leap Forward (1958-62) was an absolute disaster that resulted in widespread famine.


It's a great example of Move Fast and Break Things applied to government.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: