Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Policy difference not partisan squables or payback for supporting his opponents. Most Democrats feel Unions are important to help workers (union and nonunion) earn more.





To base the decision on what companies to invite to an EV summit on whether they support the Democrats' favorite constituents is pure politics. The only policy difference here is one which helps the Democrats win elections.

It's not

Democrats believe that unions help keep wages high and are good for the economy.

If Musk wasn't anti union he probably would have been invited. I say probably because of Teslas issues with racial discrimination


It doesn’t matter what Democrats think about unions. This wasn’t a union summit or a summit on party values—it was about EVs. Tesla is the world leader in EVs and the top American EV manufacturer. Excluding them because they don’t support unionization — an issue tied to massive political support for Democrats through campaign contributions and institutional backing—is indefensible. It undermines the purpose of the summit through rank politicization and partisanship.

As for the claim that Tesla has racial discrimination issues—that’s a distortion. Nearly every major company gets hit with discrimination lawsuits because civil rights law has been weaponized to make that outcome nearly inevitable:

https://www.richardhanania.com/p/wokeness-as-saddam-statues-...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: