Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

to be entirely fair that's quite a high bar even for most "traditional" open source.

And even if you had the same data, there's no guarantee the random perturbations during training are driven by a PRNG and done in a way that is reproducible.

Reproducibility does not make something open source. Reproducibility doesn't even necessarily make something free software (under the GNU interpretation). I mean hell, most docker containers aren't even hash-reproducible.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: