Or the person that starts off in "get it done" mode because it looks trivial, notices that it's not and then takes a few steps back to think it through first.
Honestly, these opinions are almost always grounded in people not being honest with themselves, feeling superior to their colleagues and coming up with a character trait and argument why they're just fundamentally better
Sometimes they even are, at least to a degree. No idea wherever it's true in this case, as I know nothing about Christian Ekrem beyond this article.
The article is about Senior Engineers where time spent is a huge factor in the distinction. It would be more that theory building becomes a tuned skill for an engineer over time as a fundamental result of their job than whether they use it every day, started with it as their primary method, etc.
Honestly, these opinions are almost always grounded in people not being honest with themselves, feeling superior to their colleagues and coming up with a character trait and argument why they're just fundamentally better
Sometimes they even are, at least to a degree. No idea wherever it's true in this case, as I know nothing about Christian Ekrem beyond this article.