I totally agree with you. On the other hand the theory behind it -to combine image recognition to predict the outcome based on specific physical impacts- does sound intriguing and like a somewhat newer idea.
But besides that, you‘re totally right. It’s too „loose“ since to realize that idea the process would have to be way different (and properly explained)
But besides that, you‘re totally right. It’s too „loose“ since to realize that idea the process would have to be way different (and properly explained)