The review clearly states that the screen failed after a few months. How exactly do you expect them to QC an issue like that? If the part arrives at your factory in full working order, you don't typically spend much time trying to make it fail unless you discover that there is a latent issue that affects a large enough proportion of those parts where the cost of screening becomes worth it.
Every volume product has failures and a single datapoint is not enough to say anything about a product's quality (good or bad). At the same time, a failure during a review is absolutely something that should be mentioned, as well as given an opportunity to test the company's RMA process. At the very least a failure like that should cause someone to look into how many other's online have similar issues.
Every volume product has failures and a single datapoint is not enough to say anything about a product's quality (good or bad). At the same time, a failure during a review is absolutely something that should be mentioned, as well as given an opportunity to test the company's RMA process. At the very least a failure like that should cause someone to look into how many other's online have similar issues.