I'm sorry but completely ignoring what I wrote is no way to conduct a discussion. In fact the only reason you wrote any of this is to escape the real topic of this conversation (and not only in the interaction with me, but with every other participant). By not showing effort to engage you are instead showing your disrespect towards us.
Your GP post says 3 conditions justify reacting against civilians of that country and even group. I point out that Palestinians satisfy all 3 conditions, as do all muslims, and that you're a racist. That for you those 3 conditions only justify anything if used against Jews, that you'd come up with some excuse to not apply them to anyone else.
And here we are. Some excuse, with accusation, to do exactly what I predicted.
Again you completely failed to engage with the main point - that a foreign country is occupying most of Palestine and that it is mass murdering Palestinians.
> Your GP post says 3 conditions justify reacting against civilians
You also seem to either misunderstand or disregard what I wrote. That is plainly rude. Go back and read it again.
So? You can say the same about every muslim country. So let's boycott them. Iran is doing that. Turkey is doing that. Morocco is doing that. Iraq is doing that. Azerbejan is doing that. And so on.
So clearly we should boycott just all muslims, since your claim is that that justifies boycotting civilians from those countries.
The whole of "islam" was not a religion until at least 1930, but an empire, which is another name for an organization that ONLY occupies other countries and populations and mass murders and exploits them. The hadith state that all of islam, country and people are the personal property of the caliph (who is allowed to, for example, kill anyone, muslim, dhimmi or slave, for any reason, making islam even more inhumane than the Romans were. This explains what current muslims pretend not to comprehend: that their grandparents were overwhelmingly very happy to see islam, the empire, end). Muslim empires have always done this exploiting through slavery, until at least 1970. There are regular accusations to middle eastern muslims that they still do so. So this is not exactly a surprise. So that's a further justification to boycott all muslims, no?
In fact Israel is an example of a region and a local population that WAS occupied by the Ottoman empire and fought itself free. In that view the conflict is entirely the reverse of what you claim it is.
But you're a racist, so none of this matters. What I'm misunderstanding is that arguments can only be used against Jews, and how much the same arguments apply to anyone else doesn't matter.
Falsely accusing me of racism shows you are not fit to participate in this discourse.
Not once did I mention "Jews", I only mentioned actions of the State of Israel. I don't care how the groups of people call themselves. What I care about is that a group of people is killing another group people. I care about the fact that one group is a well-equipped army and most of the killed are civilians. It is wrong that this happens. You don't care about that, in fact it very much looks like you are the racist here, obsessed about "muslims" and some nonsensical interpretation of history and cheering that they are being mass murdered. This is shameful behavior from your side.
