That still exposes the timestamp, and the shift just drops precision, so I'm not... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		michelpp 20 days ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: UUIDv47: Store UUIDv7 in DB, emit UUIDv4 outside (... That still exposes the timestamp, and the shift just drops precision, so I'm not sure what you're going for here.

sergeyprokhoren 19 days ago [–]

If you shift the timestamp forward by 5 thousand years, it can hardly be called just a decrease in precision.

Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact