Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If you're in the Atacama Desert, I doubt it's 40%, but not really relevant.

This is ALL renewables, not just Solar - the article states that Solar is ~20% now in the EU.

Wind typically counts for ~15%, and Hydro (which may or may not be counted as renewable) counts as ~15%.

So most places can pretty easily get to ~40% solar, ~15% wind, ~15% hydro = ~70% renewable.

Throw in ~20% Nuclear (basically all of Europe before Germany sh*t the bed), and you're at ~90% - with limited need for storage - a large portion of which could come from infra that already exists for pumped hydro and regular overnight solar storage.

We're quite a ways away from diminishing returns.

We're ~8 years away from a global ~40% of electricity coming from solar EVEN IF it continues to grow at ~30% YoY.





> Hydro (which may or may not be counted as renewable) counts as ~15%.

Why or when wouldn't one consider hydropower a renewable energy source?


Ex worked in an NGO that fights the expansion of hydro in Portugal.

There are several reasons. It's destructive, has very high emissions, and doesn't actually generate that much power because we have long-ish drought seasons. Hydro was fueled or fueling corrupt construction deals while destroying natural reserves and wildlife. In some cases, night-time hydro was much more expensive than any other power source.


Look at the Hoover dam

You mean low water levels? Isn’t it caused by agriculture water use? A dam allows to use more water (for agriculture) but one can choose not to use more.



Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: