While obviously I can present alternatives to OpenPGP and have done so, including on this thread, it's important that you understand that this isn't how engineering works. If something is observed to be flawed, it's flawed. Whether or not alternatives are presented with the observation doesn't change its validity.
I understand what you are saying. Can you tell me in what ways OpenPGP is flawed and what the alternative is to achieve everything GPG supports? Legit question. If it does everything GPG does, but does it better, then people (including me) may switch.
I'm really not interested in whether you switch. To me, for the problem domains we're really talking about, this is like talking someone out of wearing a Kangol hat. You do you.
This is absurd. You have not told me (or anyone else for that matter) what to switch to and why.
You cannot be taken seriously. At this point I think you are full of shit.
If you care about security, you should care about people switching, but you do you. Keep it to yourself, keep it a secret, and keep bitching about OpenPGP, I suppose.
