Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

pretty cool to assume that china must be “bad at war” vs. thinking that you can be a lot more profitable in peace :)




It's a valid question. Presumably a given company will do what is most profitable for it whether that's lobbying for peace or war. It's worthwhile to try to understand what the differences in either circumstances or policy might be that led to an alternate outcome.

Bad reading comprehension.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: