Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Maybe I'm the odd one out but I love doing stuff that has long term stability written all over it. In fact the IT world moving as fast as it does is one of my major frustrations. Professionally I have to keep up so I'm reading myself absolutely silly but it is getting to the point where I expect that one of these days I'll end up being surprised because a now 'well known technique' was completely unknown to me.


I agree. We are going as far as being asked to release our public app on self-hosted kube cluster in 9 months, with no kube experience and nobody with a CKA in a 2.5 person ops team. "Just do it it's easy" is the name of the game now, if you fail you're bad, if you offer stability and respect delivery dates you are out-fashioned, and the discussion comes back every week and every warning and concern is ignored.

I remember a long time ago one of our client was a bank, they had 2 datacenters with a LACP router, SPARC machines, Solaris, VxFS, Sybase, Java app. They survived 20 years with app, OS and hardware upgrades and 0 second of downtime. And I get lectured by a 3 years old developer that I should know better.


> "just do it, its easy"

If its that easy, then why aren't they doing it instead of you? Yeah, I thought so.


> "just do it, its easy"

This is where devops came from. Developers saw admins and said I can do that in code! Every time egotistical, eager to please developers say something is easy, business says ok, do it.

This is also where agile (developers doing project management) comes from.


> I love doing stuff that has long term stability written all over it

I also love doing stuff that has long term stability written all over it. In my 20 year career of trying to do that through various roles, I've learnt that it comes with a number of prerequisites:

1. Minimising & controlling your dependencies. Ensuring code you own is stable long term is an entirely different task to ensuring upstream code continues to be available & functional. Pinning only goes sofar when it comes to CVEs.

2. Start from scratch. The effort to bring an inherited codebase that was explicitly not written with longevity in mind into line with your own standards may seem like a fun challenge, but it becomes less fun at a certain scale.

3. Scale. If you're doing anything in (1) & (2) to any extent, keep it small.

Absolutely none of the above is remotely applicable to a project like Ubuntu.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: