Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That looks like "half" of the proof using a square:

https://www.onlinemathlearning.com/image-files/xpythagorean-...

where you draw three extra triangles, not just one, and they surround a square of c x c. Think about it as making two copies of the trapezoid, one rotated on top of the other.



I shared this one with my son, the step where the 2ab expressions cancel out gave him a little aha moment.


This was exactly what I thought of as well.

Garfield’s version seems more complicated since you have to calculate the area of a trapezoid instead of the area of a square, but conceptually they are the same.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: