Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It sounds like it was something like PLA when it was supposed to be ABS.

According to https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69297a4e345e3...

> The aircraft owner [...] understood from the vendor that it was printed from CF-ABS (carbon fibre – acrylonitrile butadiene styrene) filament material, with a glass transition temperature of 105°C [...] he was satisfied the component was fit for use in this application when it was installed.

> [...] Two samples from the air induction elbow were subjected to testing, [...] The measured glass transition temperature for the first sample was 52.8°C, and 54.0°C for the second sample.

I've known 3D printing folks who run off a throwaway prototype in a cheap, easy-to-print material to check for fit before printing in more difficult, expensive materials. Easy to imagine a careless manufacturer getting the PLA prototype mixed in with the ABS production parts, and selling it by mistake.

Of course, the aviation industry usually steers clear of careless manufactures....



That's... absurd. ABS is a terrible choice for anything in an engine bay - ABS breaks down over time when in contact with oils.

I've used PA6-CF for similar purposes in the past. Obviously not for aircraft, though.


You'd be very hard pressed to confuse PLA with carbon fiber reinforced ABS. The latter has a definite surface texture that's hard to get confused with that of PLA.


Even in ABS I would not use something 3D printed on a consumer machine as a critical part of an airplane.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: