Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If purging (substantial and interesting) one-to-one conversation is an intended effect I think that'd be a shame.


No, that's not intended. If it happens we'll fix it.


This would be great to keep an eye on.

eg:

Two commenters X,Y with sub-threshold karma (<1,000) could never have a dialogue (two-way, real-time) as a third party Z would need to endorse their each and every comment.

Two commenters X,Y (Karma 1,000+ each) in substantially different timezones with a-synchronous dialogue (eg, overnight replies) would need a third party z to endorse each and every comment (at least until the other wakes up).

Two commenters X,Y (Karma 1,000+ each) with opposing views, could never have a real-time dialogue without a third party z to endorse each and every comment (unless #)

Hopefully these are at least helpful to dilineate.

# "Thank you sir, can I have another".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: