Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I agree. This reminiscent of a manager that wants to make a mark by creating arbitrary, vague rules out of the blue.

This a community. Was there a "we think we may have a gratuitous negativity problem" discussion?

Thin end of the wedge, perhaps. I hope not.

(From the article) "Too much gratuitous negativity might be the difference between someone giving up on a crazy idea and building the next Airbnb."

If negative, anonymous feedback here disuades and disenchants them, what hope is there?

Are we going to have a Safe Place section of the site, to protect applicants from all bad things?

Bad things happen. Mean people will say mean things on the Internet. Life is hard.



> If negative, anonymous feedback here disuades and disenchants them, what hope is there?

Absolutely. See Dropbox's Show HN, the slashdot iPod announcement, and every other worthwhile product ever. As a community we're pretty bad at picking successes.


People are also erroneously overrating things all the time. The problem with our predictions isn't a skew to negativity, just the normal inability to predict the future due to lack of knowledge.


There's also a definite survivorship bias (and an equally strong failure bias) to remember only the outliers. Most ideas fall squarely in the middle and we promptly forget about them.

(obligatory xkcd https://xkcd.com/1497/)




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: