Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The topline is that the meteoric growth has already occurred. 18% quarterly revenue growth is good, YoY growth was 15x that.


Imo this depends on whether the limiting factor is demand or production.

If it's production capacity, then if in a year they're able to get TSMC to make them twice as many chips, they could likely increase their growth rate?

I'd be sweating if I were any of TSMCs other customers right now and trying to renew my contract. Idk what the ratio is in size between an H100 and an M3, but I doubt it's anywhere near proportional to how much nvidia is willing to offer TSMC.


Nvidia is doing fine :), but it would be better for them if they were not limited. Hopefully, and probably, you are right and production is limiting.


>I'd be sweating if I were any of TSMCs other customers right now and trying to renew my contract.

How many TSMC's customers need the latest tech?


Anyone that wants to keep selling new phones every year?


18% quarterly comes to around 190% yearly, still _very_ good!


18% quarterly growth is 94% yearly growth.


oof, off by 100%, my bad


more like 90% lol


> meteoric growth

Are you aware that meteors only go down, never up?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: